Belarus vs Nicaragua: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre

Belarus
39,992 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
45,263 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
121st
Nicaragua rank
119th

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Nicaragua
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 45,263 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 39,992 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 5,271 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Belarus ranks 121st and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1990s 1,921 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 2,413 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 491.64 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 9,125 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 6,625 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 2,499 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 32,350 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 18,451 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 13,899 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 39,333 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 35,545 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 3,788 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre, Belarus or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 45,263 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 39,992 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre between Belarus and Nicaragua?
5,271 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nicaragua?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Nicaragua rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 121st and Nicaragua ranks 119th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nicaragua: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nicaragua/">Belarus vs Nicaragua: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.