Angola vs Kazakhstan: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre

Angola
11,183 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
13,322 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
144th
Kazakhstan rank
142nd

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Angola
  • Kazakhstan
010.0k20.0k30.0k199320082023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 13,322 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 11,183 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 2,139 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Angola ranks 144th and Kazakhstan ranks 142nd of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 300.05 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 726.68 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 426.63 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 4,684 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 4,033 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 650.66 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2010s 18,695 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 10,663 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 8,033 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Angola
2020s 11,199 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 13,062 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre 1,863 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre, Angola or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 13,322 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre against 11,183 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre between Angola and Kazakhstan?
2,139 includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kazakhstan?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Angola and Kazakhstan rank globally for total reserves (includes gold, current us$), per square kilometre?
Angola ranks 144th and Kazakhstan ranks 142nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Kazakhstan: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-reserves-includes-gold-current-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/kazakhstan/">Angola vs Kazakhstan: Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
includes gold, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 8,952 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total reserves (includes gold, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.