India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient

India
4,436 million constant US$
in 2024
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
9,206 million constant US$
in 2024
India rank
2nd
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank
7th

Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient over time

  • India
  • Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200620152024

How they compare

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) currently reports 9,206 million constant US$ against 4,436 million constant US$ in India, a difference of 4,770 million constant US$.

That makes Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.1 times India's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

India ranks 2nd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 164 countries.

Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
2000s 1,265 million constant US$ 5,173 million constant US$ 3,909 million constant US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2010s 2,592 million constant US$ 7,514 million constant US$ 4,923 million constant US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3,726 million constant US$ 8,103 million constant US$ 4,376 million constant US$ Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total official flows (disbursement) for aid for trade, by recipient, India or Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs), at 9,206 million constant US$ against 4,436 million constant US$ in India as of 2024.
What is the difference in total official flows (disbursement) for aid for trade, by recipient between India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
4,770 million constant US$, with Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs)?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do India and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) rank globally for total official flows (disbursement) for aid for trade, by recipient?
India ranks 2nd and Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) ranks 7th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient. Statizoid, drawing on United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-official-flows-disbursement-for-aid-for-trade-by-recipient-countries-millions-of/india/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-official-flows-disbursement-for-aid-for-trade-by-recipient-countries-millions-of/india/landlocked-developing-countries-lldcs/">India vs Landlocked developing countries (LLDCs): Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)
Unit
million constant US$
Source
United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database
Licence
UN SDG Global Database (open, attribution requested)
Coverage
193 places, 3,536 data points, 2006–2024
Last refreshed