Northern Africa vs Poland: Total FDI outflows — Value US$
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ over time
- Northern Africa
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 10,403 million USD against 1,350 million USD in Northern Africa, a difference of 9,053 million USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 7.7 times Northern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Northern Africa ahead.
Northern Africa ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 25th of 30 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Northern Africa averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 129.56 million USD | 54.73 million USD | 74.83 million USD | Northern Africa |
| 2000s | 1,946 million USD | 2,771 million USD | 825.18 million USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 1,701 million USD | 3,916 million USD | 2,215 million USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 1,091 million USD | 5,298 million USD | 4,207 million USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, Northern Africa or Poland?
- Poland, at 10,403 million USD against 1,350 million USD in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$ between Northern Africa and Poland?
- 9,053 million USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Poland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Northern Africa and Poland rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$?
- Northern Africa ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 25th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.