Greece vs Hungary: Total FDI outflows — Value US$

Greece
3,952 million USD
in 2023
Hungary
3,299 million USD
in 2023
Greece rank
39th
Hungary rank
41st

Total FDI outflows — Value US$ over time

  • Greece
  • Hungary
-20.0k-10.0k010.0k199020062023

How they compare

Greece currently reports 3,952 million USD against 3,299 million USD in Hungary, a difference of 653 million USD.

That makes Greece's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 39th and Hungary ranks 41st of 182 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 61.03 million USD 138.11 million USD 77.08 million USD Hungary
2000s 2,008 million USD 1,826 million USD 182.19 million USD Greece
2010s 743.91 million USD 696.51 million USD 47.4 million USD Greece
2020s 2,202 million USD 3,999 million USD 1,797 million USD Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, Greece or Hungary?
Greece, at 3,952 million USD against 3,299 million USD in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$ between Greece and Hungary?
653 million USD, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Hungary?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Greece and Hungary rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$?
Greece ranks 39th and Hungary ranks 41st of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Total FDI outflows — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 6,077 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.