Central Asia vs Poland: Total FDI outflows — Value US$
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ over time
- Central Asia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 10,403 million USD against 965.81 million USD in Central Asia, a difference of 9,437 million USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 10.8 times Central Asia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Poland ahead.
Central Asia ranks 25th and Poland ranks 25th of 30 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.11 million USD | 86.32 million USD | 79.22 million USD | Poland |
| 2000s | 1,606 million USD | 2,771 million USD | 1,165 million USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 1,344 million USD | 3,916 million USD | 2,573 million USD | Poland |
| 2020s | -406.53 million USD | 5,298 million USD | 5,704 million USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, Central Asia or Poland?
- Poland, at 10,403 million USD against 965.81 million USD in Central Asia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$ between Central Asia and Poland?
- 9,437 million USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Poland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Poland rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$?
- Central Asia ranks 25th and Poland ranks 25th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.