Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Total FDI outflows — Value US$
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ over time
- Belgium
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 12,072 million USD against 214.91 million USD in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 11,857 million USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 56.2 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 23rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 168 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23,035 million USD | -4 million USD | 23,039 million USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 38,064 million USD | 104.75 million USD | 37,960 million USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 20,313 million USD | 167.25 million USD | 20,146 million USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, Belgium or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Belgium, at 12,072 million USD against 214.91 million USD in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$ between Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 11,857 million USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$?
- Belgium ranks 23rd and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.