El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
El Salvador
29.49 million USD
in 2023
Zimbabwe
30.5 million USD
in 2023
El Salvador rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- El Salvador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30.5 million USD against 29.49 million USD in El Salvador, a difference of 1.01 million USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.8 million USD | 9 million USD | 44.8 million USD | El Salvador |
| 2000s | -28.9 million USD | 5.29 million USD | 34.19 million USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | -0.3272 million USD | 38.9 million USD | 39.23 million USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 23.18 million USD | 38.45 million USD | 15.27 million USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30.5 million USD against 29.49 million USD in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 1.01 million USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- El Salvador ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.