Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Romania: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Romania
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 47.69 million USD against 40.32 million USD in Romania, a difference of 7.37 million USD.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Romania ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 100th and Romania ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.36 million USD | 166.47 million USD | 157.11 million USD | Romania |
| 2010s | 41.46 million USD | 42.73 million USD | 1.28 million USD | Romania |
| 2020s | 54.09 million USD | 383.03 million USD | 328.93 million USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Romania?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 47.69 million USD against 40.32 million USD in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Romania?
- 7.37 million USD, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Romania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Romania rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 100th and Romania ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.