Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
Bangladesh
29.88 million USD
in 2023
Zimbabwe
30.5 million USD
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
114th
Zimbabwe rank
113th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 30.5 million USD against 29.88 million USD in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.62 million USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.17 million USD | 16.34 million USD | 14.17 million USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 10.51 million USD | 5.29 million USD | 5.22 million USD | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 43.2 million USD | 38.9 million USD | 4.3 million USD | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 46.44 million USD | 38.45 million USD | 7.99 million USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, Bangladesh or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 30.5 million USD against 29.88 million USD in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
- 0.62 million USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Zimbabwe rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.