Bangladesh vs Congo: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
Bangladesh
29.88 million USD
in 2023
Congo
26.36 million USD
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
114th
Congo rank
117th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Congo
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 29.88 million USD against 26.36 million USD in Congo, a difference of 3.52 million USD.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 114th and Congo ranks 117th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.17 million USD | 2.24 million USD | 0.0701 million USD | Congo |
| 2000s | 11.32 million USD | -0.4087 million USD | 11.73 million USD | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 43.2 million USD | 5.22 million USD | 37.97 million USD | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 46.44 million USD | 25.84 million USD | 20.6 million USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, Bangladesh or Congo?
- Bangladesh, at 29.88 million USD against 26.36 million USD in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between Bangladesh and Congo?
- 3.52 million USD, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Congo?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Congo rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 114th and Congo ranks 117th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.