Azerbaijan vs China, Macao SAR: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled over time
- Azerbaijan
- China, Macao SAR
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1,875 million USD against 1,607 million USD in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 268 million USD.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times China, Macao SAR's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 44th and China, Macao SAR ranks 45th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and China, Macao SAR in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | China, Macao SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 661.74 million USD | 67.73 million USD | 594.01 million USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 1,927 million USD | 280.51 million USD | 1,646 million USD | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 737.43 million USD | 1,757 million USD | 1,019 million USD | China, Macao SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled, Azerbaijan or China, Macao SAR?
- Azerbaijan, at 1,875 million USD against 1,607 million USD in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled between Azerbaijan and China, Macao SAR?
- 268 million USD, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China, Macao SAR?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and China, Macao SAR rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, gaps filled?
- Azerbaijan ranks 44th and China, Macao SAR ranks 45th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$ with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.