Grenada vs Uzbekistan: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Grenada
18.05 million USD
in 2023
Uzbekistan
17.09 million USD
in 2023
Grenada rank
118th
Uzbekistan rank
120th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Grenada
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 18.05 million USD against 17.09 million USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.96 million USD.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 118th and Uzbekistan ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.7 million USD | 6.43 million USD | 22.27 million USD | Grenada |
| 2020s | -6.11 million USD | 12.03 million USD | 18.13 million USD | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Grenada or Uzbekistan?
- Grenada, at 18.05 million USD against 17.09 million USD in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Grenada and Uzbekistan?
- 0.96 million USD, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Uzbekistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Uzbekistan rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Grenada ranks 118th and Uzbekistan ranks 120th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.