Grenada vs Mauritius: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Grenada
18.05 million USD
in 2023
Mauritius
16.03 million USD
in 2023
Grenada rank
118th
Mauritius rank
121st
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Grenada
- Mauritius
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 18.05 million USD against 16.03 million USD in Mauritius, a difference of 2.02 million USD.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Mauritius ahead.
Grenada ranks 118th and Mauritius ranks 121st of 183 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.7 million USD | 108.53 million USD | 79.83 million USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | -6.11 million USD | 40.54 million USD | 46.65 million USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Grenada or Mauritius?
- Grenada, at 18.05 million USD against 16.03 million USD in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Grenada and Mauritius?
- 2.02 million USD, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Mauritius rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Grenada ranks 118th and Mauritius ranks 121st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.