Congo vs Uzbekistan: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Congo
18.52 million USD
in 2023
Uzbekistan
17.09 million USD
in 2023
Congo rank
117th
Uzbekistan rank
120th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Congo
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 18.52 million USD against 17.09 million USD in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1.43 million USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 117th and Uzbekistan ranks 120th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.68 million USD | 5.38 million USD | 0.6964 million USD | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 18.92 million USD | 12.03 million USD | 6.89 million USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Congo or Uzbekistan?
- Congo, at 18.52 million USD against 17.09 million USD in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Congo and Uzbekistan?
- 1.43 million USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uzbekistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Uzbekistan rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 117th and Uzbekistan ranks 120th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.