Congo vs Grenada: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Congo
18.52 million USD
in 2023
Grenada
18.05 million USD
in 2023
Congo rank
117th
Grenada rank
118th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Congo
- Grenada
How they compare
Congo currently reports 18.52 million USD against 18.05 million USD in Grenada, a difference of 0.47 million USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Grenada ahead.
Congo ranks 117th and Grenada ranks 118th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 7.87 million USD | 28.7 million USD | 20.83 million USD | Grenada |
| 2020s | 18.92 million USD | -6.11 million USD | 25.02 million USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Congo or Grenada?
- Congo, at 18.52 million USD against 18.05 million USD in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Congo and Grenada?
- 0.47 million USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Grenada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Grenada rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Congo ranks 117th and Grenada ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.