Cabo Verde vs Timor-Leste: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Cabo Verde
-6.49 million USD
in 2023
Timor-Leste
-14.03 million USD
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
164th
Timor-Leste rank
166th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Cabo Verde
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports -6.49 million USD against -14.03 million USD in Timor-Leste, a difference of 7.54 million USD.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 164th and Timor-Leste ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -4.63 million USD | 6.61 million USD | 11.24 million USD | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | -3.19 million USD | -21.64 million USD | 18.46 million USD | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Cabo Verde or Timor-Leste?
- Cabo Verde, at -6.49 million USD against -14.03 million USD in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Cabo Verde and Timor-Leste?
- 7.54 million USD, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Timor-Leste?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Timor-Leste rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Cabo Verde ranks 164th and Timor-Leste ranks 166th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.