Botswana vs Timor-Leste: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Botswana
-35.59 million USD
in 2023
Timor-Leste
-14.03 million USD
in 2023
Botswana rank
169th
Timor-Leste rank
166th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Botswana
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports -14.03 million USD against -35.59 million USD in Botswana, a difference of 21.56 million USD.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Botswana ranks 169th and Timor-Leste ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 58.28 million USD | 6.61 million USD | 51.67 million USD | Botswana |
| 2020s | -30.9 million USD | -21.64 million USD | 9.26 million USD | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Botswana or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at -14.03 million USD against -35.59 million USD in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Botswana and Timor-Leste?
- 21.56 million USD, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Timor-Leste?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Timor-Leste rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Botswana ranks 169th and Timor-Leste ranks 166th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.