Belarus vs Grenada: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Belarus
19.32 million USD
in 2023
Grenada
18.05 million USD
in 2023
Belarus rank
115th
Grenada rank
118th
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Belarus
- Grenada
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 19.32 million USD against 18.05 million USD in Grenada, a difference of 1.27 million USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 115th and Grenada ranks 118th of 183 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 69.61 million USD | 28.7 million USD | 40.91 million USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 44.42 million USD | -6.11 million USD | 50.53 million USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Belarus or Grenada?
- Belarus, at 19.32 million USD against 18.05 million USD in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Belarus and Grenada?
- 1.27 million USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Grenada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Grenada rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Belarus ranks 115th and Grenada ranks 118th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.