Afghanistan vs Malawi: Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled)
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled (gaps filled) over time
- Afghanistan
- Malawi
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 34.76 million USD against 28.27 million USD in Malawi, a difference of 6.49 million USD.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1411 million USD | 5.27 million USD | 5.13 million USD | Malawi |
| 2010s | 9.22 million USD | -8.17 million USD | 17.39 million USD | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 37.5 million USD | -58.6 million USD | 96.1 million USD | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled, Afghanistan or Malawi?
- Afghanistan, at 34.76 million USD against 28.27 million USD in Malawi as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled between Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 6.49 million USD, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Malawi?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Afghanistan and Malawi rank globally for total fdi outflows — value us$, 2015 prices, gaps filled?
- Afghanistan ranks 104th and Malawi ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total FDI outflows — Value US$, 2015 prices with 95 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.