Brazil vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Total FDI inflows — Value US$
Total FDI inflows — Value US$ over time
- Brazil
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 65,897 million USD against 1,668 million USD in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 64,229 million USD.
That makes Brazil's figure about 39.5 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 4th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,922 million USD | 54.79 million USD | 9,867 million USD | Brazil |
| 2000s | 23,660 million USD | 1,280 million USD | 22,380 million USD | Brazil |
| 2010s | 67,865 million USD | 1,580 million USD | 66,285 million USD | Brazil |
| 2020s | 46,342 million USD | 1,086 million USD | 45,257 million USD | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, Brazil or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Brazil, at 65,897 million USD against 1,668 million USD in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$ between Brazil and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 64,229 million USD, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$?
- Brazil ranks 4th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.