Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0015 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0015 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
133rd
Zimbabwe rank
132nd

Total FDI inflows — Value US$, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 174 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
0 million USD per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 133rd and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-fdi-inflows-value-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/total-fdi-inflows-value-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total FDI inflows — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,645 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Total FDI inflows — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.