Oceania vs Sweden: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Oceania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 29,018 million USD against 27,713 million USD in Oceania, a difference of 1,305 million USD.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 10th of 30 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Oceania averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14,297 million USD | 15,989 million USD | 1,691 million USD | Sweden |
| 2000s | 28,966 million USD | 16,671 million USD | 12,295 million USD | Oceania |
| 2010s | 46,855 million USD | 8,089 million USD | 38,766 million USD | Oceania |
| 2020s | 32,641 million USD | 29,301 million USD | 3,340 million USD | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices, Oceania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 29,018 million USD against 27,713 million USD in Oceania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices between Oceania and Sweden?
- 1,305 million USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sweden?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Oceania and Sweden rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Oceania ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 10th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.