New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- New Zealand
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 3,187 million USD against 3,141 million USD in New Zealand, a difference of 46 million USD.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,760 million USD | 112.23 million USD | 3,647 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 2,479 million USD | 524.28 million USD | 1,955 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 2,152 million USD | 1,692 million USD | 460.14 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 4,402 million USD | 3,499 million USD | 902.88 million USD | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices, New Zealand or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 3,187 million USD against 3,141 million USD in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices between New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
- 46 million USD, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Uzbekistan rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices?
- New Zealand ranks 53rd and Uzbekistan ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.