New Zealand vs Serbia: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3,301 million USD against 3,141 million USD in New Zealand, a difference of 160 million USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 50th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,747 million USD | 378.34 million USD | 2,368 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 2,479 million USD | 1,750 million USD | 728.62 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 2,152 million USD | 2,465 million USD | 312.88 million USD | Serbia |
| 2020s | 4,402 million USD | 3,359 million USD | 1,043 million USD | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices, New Zealand or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 3,301 million USD against 3,141 million USD in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 160 million USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices?
- New Zealand ranks 53rd and Serbia ranks 50th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.