Eastern Europe vs Japan: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Eastern Europe
- Japan
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 49,367 million USD against 23,516 million USD in Japan, a difference of 25,851 million USD.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 2.1 times Japan's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 15th and Japan ranks 17th of 30 groups.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,625 million USD | 2,348 million USD | 19,277 million USD | Eastern Europe |
| 2000s | 61,102 million USD | 15,186 million USD | 45,916 million USD | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 55,401 million USD | 6,202 million USD | 49,199 million USD | Eastern Europe |
| 2020s | 56,712 million USD | 25,177 million USD | 31,535 million USD | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices, Eastern Europe or Japan?
- Eastern Europe, at 49,367 million USD against 23,516 million USD in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices between Eastern Europe and Japan?
- 25,851 million USD, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Japan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Europe and Japan rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Eastern Europe ranks 15th and Japan ranks 17th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.