Belgium vs Eastern Africa: Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Belgium
- Eastern Africa
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 19,055 million USD against 12,534 million USD in Eastern Africa, a difference of 6,521 million USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.5 times Eastern Africa's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 20th and Eastern Africa ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Eastern Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Eastern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,324 million USD | 5,115 million USD | 58,210 million USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 32,418 million USD | 12,526 million USD | 19,892 million USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 10,025 million USD | 13,708 million USD | 3,684 million USD | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices, Belgium or Eastern Africa?
- Belgium, at 19,055 million USD against 12,534 million USD in Eastern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices between Belgium and Eastern Africa?
- 6,521 million USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Eastern Africa?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Eastern Africa rank globally for total fdi inflows — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Belgium ranks 20th and Eastern Africa ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total FDI inflows — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
FDI is an investment which aims to acquire a lasting management influence (10 percent or more of the voting stock) in an enterprise operating in a foreign economy. FDI may be undertaken by individuals, as well as business entities. The foreign direct investor most often is aiming to gain access to natural resources, to markets, to labour supply, to technology, to ensure security of supplies or to control the quality of a certain product. FDI can be decomposed into two types of investments: mergers and acquisitions (MA) and greenfield investments. The latter type results in the creation of new entities and the setting up of offices, buildings, plants or factories from scratch in a foreign economy. FDI is the sum of equity capital, reinvested earnings and other FDI capital. Equity capital comprises equity in branches, all shares in subsidiaries and associates (except non-participating, preferred shares that are treated as debt securities and are included under other FDI capital) and other contributions such as the provision of machinery. Reinvested earnings consist of the direct investor's share (in proportion to equity participation) of earnings not distributed by the direct investment enterprise. Other FDI capital (loans) includes the borrowing and lending of funds, including debt securities and trade credits between direct investors and direct investment enterprises. FDI inflows and outflows are important for tracking the direct investment conditions each year. Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions from the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises resident abroad. Whereas, Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows record the value of cross-border direct investment transactions received by the reporting economy during a year. It represents transactions affecting the investment in enterprises of a specific industry resident in the reporting economy.