Melanesia vs Micronesia: Total Expenditure (highest government level) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (highest government level) — Value US$ over time
- Melanesia
- Micronesia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 13,588 million USD against 872.12 million USD in Micronesia, a difference of 12,716 million USD.
That makes Melanesia's figure about 15.6 times Micronesia's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Melanesia has been ahead every year.
Melanesia ranks 5th and Micronesia ranks 7th of 7 regions.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,519 million USD | 300.02 million USD | 5,219 million USD | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 10,646 million USD | 514.7 million USD | 10,131 million USD | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 12,937 million USD | 803.82 million USD | 12,134 million USD | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (highest government level) — value us$, Melanesia or Micronesia?
- Melanesia, at 13,588 million USD against 872.12 million USD in Micronesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (highest government level) — value us$ between Melanesia and Micronesia?
- 12,716 million USD, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Micronesia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Melanesia and Micronesia rank globally for total expenditure (highest government level) — value us$?
- Melanesia ranks 5th and Micronesia ranks 7th of 7 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (highest government level) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.