Kyrgyzstan vs New Caledonia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$ over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 4,910 million USD against 4,901 million USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 9 million USD.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 114 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 767.69 million USD | 3,267 million USD | 2,499 million USD | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 2,636 million USD | 5,061 million USD | 2,424 million USD | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, Kyrgyzstan or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 4,910 million USD against 4,901 million USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$ between Kyrgyzstan and New Caledonia?
- 9 million USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and New Caledonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and New Caledonia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 92nd and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.