Honduras vs North Macedonia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$ over time
- Honduras
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 6,439 million USD against 5,445 million USD in Honduras, a difference of 994 million USD.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Honduras's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 89th and North Macedonia ranks 87th of 114 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,262 million USD | 2,781 million USD | 480.83 million USD | Honduras |
| 2010s | 5,011 million USD | 3,562 million USD | 1,449 million USD | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, Honduras or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 6,439 million USD against 5,445 million USD in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$ between Honduras and North Macedonia?
- 994 million USD, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and North Macedonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2015.
- How do Honduras and North Macedonia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$?
- Honduras ranks 89th and North Macedonia ranks 87th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.