Honduras vs New Caledonia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$ over time
- Honduras
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 5,445 million USD against 4,910 million USD in New Caledonia, a difference of 535 million USD.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Honduras ranks 89th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 114 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,843 million USD | 3,663 million USD | 819.61 million USD | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 5,011 million USD | 5,132 million USD | 121.4 million USD | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, Honduras or New Caledonia?
- Honduras, at 5,445 million USD against 4,910 million USD in New Caledonia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$ between Honduras and New Caledonia?
- 535 million USD, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and New Caledonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Honduras and New Caledonia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$?
- Honduras ranks 89th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.