Estonia vs Myanmar: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$ over time
- Estonia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 18,812 million USD against 17,763 million USD in Myanmar, a difference of 1,049 million USD.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 65th and Myanmar ranks 67th of 114 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,458 million USD | 2,983 million USD | 2,475 million USD | Estonia |
| 2010s | 9,876 million USD | 12,515 million USD | 2,639 million USD | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 14,236 million USD | 17,763 million USD | 3,527 million USD | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, Estonia or Myanmar?
- Estonia, at 18,812 million USD against 17,763 million USD in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$ between Estonia and Myanmar?
- 1,049 million USD, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Myanmar?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Estonia and Myanmar rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$?
- Estonia ranks 65th and Myanmar ranks 67th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.