China, Macao SAR vs Yemen: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$ over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 13,554 million USD against 11,509 million USD in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 2,045 million USD.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.2 times China, Macao SAR's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
China, Macao SAR ranks 76th and Yemen ranks 73rd of 114 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,309 million USD | 6,613 million USD | 4,305 million USD | Yemen |
| 2010s | 5,978 million USD | 11,237 million USD | 5,259 million USD | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, China, Macao SAR or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 13,554 million USD against 11,509 million USD in China, Macao SAR as of 2014.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$ between China, Macao SAR and Yemen?
- 2,045 million USD, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Yemen?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Yemen rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 76th and Yemen ranks 73rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.