China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kazakhstan: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$ over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 97,834 million USD against 68,381 million USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 29,453 million USD.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.4 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Kazakhstan ranks 44th of 114 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,618 million USD | 18,877 million USD | 16,741 million USD | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 60,158 million USD | 36,927 million USD | 23,231 million USD | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 102,898 million USD | 49,603 million USD | 53,295 million USD | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, China, Hong Kong SAR or Kazakhstan?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 97,834 million USD against 68,381 million USD in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$ between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kazakhstan?
- 29,453 million USD, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kazakhstan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kazakhstan rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 41st and Kazakhstan ranks 44th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.