Belarus vs Oman: Total Expenditure (general government) β Value US$
Total Expenditure (general government) β Value US$ over time
- Belarus
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 31,836 million USD against 30,350 million USD in Belarus, a difference of 1,486 million USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 57th and Oman ranks 56th of 114 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,185 million USD | 13,651 million USD | 4,533 million USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 25,041 million USD | 33,035 million USD | 7,995 million USD | Oman |
| 2020s | 28,144 million USD | 31,911 million USD | 3,767 million USD | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) β value us$, Belarus or Oman?
- Oman, at 31,836 million USD against 30,350 million USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) β value us$ between Belarus and Oman?
- 1,486 million USD, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Oman?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Oman rank globally for total expenditure (general government) β value us$?
- Belarus ranks 57th and Oman ranks 56th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) β Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.