Serbia vs Slovenia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Serbia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 25,908 million USD against 23,398 million USD in Serbia, a difference of 2,510 million USD.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 59th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 114 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,958 million USD | 18,126 million USD | 5,168 million USD | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 17,231 million USD | 21,186 million USD | 3,955 million USD | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 22,874 million USD | 25,407 million USD | 2,533 million USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Serbia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 25,908 million USD against 23,398 million USD in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Serbia and Slovenia?
- 2,510 million USD, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Slovenia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Serbia and Slovenia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Serbia ranks 59th and Slovenia ranks 56th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.