North Macedonia vs Rwanda: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- North Macedonia
- Rwanda
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 4,625 million USD against 3,963 million USD in Rwanda, a difference of 662 million USD.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 91st and Rwanda ranks 94th of 114 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,372 million USD | 1,800 million USD | 1,573 million USD | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 4,259 million USD | 3,631 million USD | 627.12 million USD | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, North Macedonia or Rwanda?
- North Macedonia, at 4,625 million USD against 3,963 million USD in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 662 million USD, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Rwanda rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- North Macedonia ranks 91st and Rwanda ranks 94th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.