Myanmar vs Tunisia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Myanmar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 16,415 million USD against 15,073 million USD in Tunisia, a difference of 1,342 million USD.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 65th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 114 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,978 million USD | 11,595 million USD | 4,617 million USD | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 8,850 million USD | 13,869 million USD | 5,018 million USD | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Myanmar or Tunisia?
- Myanmar, at 16,415 million USD against 15,073 million USD in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Myanmar and Tunisia?
- 1,342 million USD, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Myanmar and Tunisia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Myanmar ranks 65th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.