Malta vs Mongolia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Malta
- Mongolia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 7,383 million USD against 6,218 million USD in Mongolia, a difference of 1,165 million USD.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 81st and Mongolia ranks 84th of 114 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,118 million USD | 1,552 million USD | 1,566 million USD | Malta |
| 2010s | 4,154 million USD | 3,670 million USD | 483.49 million USD | Malta |
| 2020s | 6,579 million USD | 5,425 million USD | 1,153 million USD | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Malta or Mongolia?
- Malta, at 7,383 million USD against 6,218 million USD in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Malta and Mongolia?
- 1,165 million USD, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mongolia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Mongolia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Malta ranks 81st and Mongolia ranks 84th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.