Grenada vs South Sudan: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Grenada
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 527.34 million USD against 416.88 million USD in Grenada, a difference of 110.46 million USD.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.3 times Grenada's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 108th and South Sudan ranks 107th of 114 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 250.26 million USD | 795.05 million USD | 544.79 million USD | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 300.98 million USD | 541.78 million USD | 240.8 million USD | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Grenada or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 527.34 million USD against 416.88 million USD in Grenada as of 2022.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Grenada and South Sudan?
- 110.46 million USD, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do Grenada and South Sudan rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Grenada ranks 108th and South Sudan ranks 107th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.