Egypt vs New Zealand: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Egypt
- New Zealand
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 100,117 million USD against 92,027 million USD in New Zealand, a difference of 8,090 million USD.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 37th and New Zealand ranks 38th of 114 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82,267 million USD | 59,444 million USD | 22,823 million USD | Egypt |
| 2010s | 98,989 million USD | 65,257 million USD | 33,733 million USD | Egypt |
| 2020s | 100,561 million USD | 87,522 million USD | 13,039 million USD | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Egypt or New Zealand?
- Egypt, at 100,117 million USD against 92,027 million USD in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Egypt and New Zealand?
- 8,090 million USD, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and New Zealand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and New Zealand rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Egypt ranks 37th and New Zealand ranks 38th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.