China, Macao SAR vs Jordan: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 11,874 million USD against 10,166 million USD in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 1,708 million USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times China, Macao SAR's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
China, Macao SAR ranks 76th and Jordan ranks 74th of 114 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,570 million USD | 12,987 million USD | 7,416 million USD | Jordan |
| 2010s | 7,572 million USD | 12,963 million USD | 5,391 million USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, China, Macao SAR or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 11,874 million USD against 10,166 million USD in China, Macao SAR as of 2016.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between China, Macao SAR and Jordan?
- 1,708 million USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2016.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Jordan rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 76th and Jordan ranks 74th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.