Belarus vs Serbia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Belarus
- Serbia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 25,164 million USD against 23,398 million USD in Serbia, a difference of 1,766 million USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 59th of 114 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,112 million USD | 12,958 million USD | 6,154 million USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 22,873 million USD | 17,231 million USD | 5,642 million USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 23,601 million USD | 22,874 million USD | 727.37 million USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Belarus or Serbia?
- Belarus, at 25,164 million USD against 23,398 million USD in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Belarus and Serbia?
- 1,766 million USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Belarus ranks 57th and Serbia ranks 59th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.