Bahamas vs Zambia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Bahamas
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 2,808 million USD against 2,289 million USD in Bahamas, a difference of 519 million USD.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 98th and Zambia ranks 97th of 114 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,473 million USD | 2,032 million USD | 559.11 million USD | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,760 million USD | 2,808 million USD | 1,048 million USD | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Bahamas or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 2,808 million USD against 2,289 million USD in Bahamas as of 2010.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Bahamas and Zambia?
- 519 million USD, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Bahamas and Zambia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Bahamas ranks 98th and Zambia ranks 97th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.