Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Azerbaijan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 17,819 million USD against 16,962 million USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 857 million USD.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 63rd and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,129 million USD | 9,597 million USD | 3,468 million USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 17,415 million USD | 13,613 million USD | 3,802 million USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices, Azerbaijan or Sri Lanka?
- Azerbaijan, at 17,819 million USD against 16,962 million USD in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices between Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
- 857 million USD, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Azerbaijan ranks 63rd and Sri Lanka ranks 64th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.