New Caledonia vs United Arab Emirates: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- New Caledonia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 518,693 million SLC against 443,806 million SLC in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 74,887 million SLC.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times United Arab Emirates's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 54th and United Arab Emirates ranks 56th of 114 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, New Caledonia or United Arab Emirates?
- New Caledonia, at 518,693 million SLC against 443,806 million SLC in United Arab Emirates as of 2017.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 74,887 million SLC, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
- How do New Caledonia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- New Caledonia ranks 54th and United Arab Emirates ranks 56th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.