Latvia vs Zambia: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Latvia
- Zambia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 18,366 million SLC against 16,825 million SLC in Zambia, a difference of 1,541 million SLC.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 94th of 114 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,359 million SLC | 7,520 million SLC | 2,161 million SLC | Zambia |
| 2010s | 8,003 million SLC | 16,825 million SLC | 8,822 million SLC | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Latvia or Zambia?
- Latvia, at 18,366 million SLC against 16,825 million SLC in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Latvia and Zambia?
- 1,541 million SLC, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Latvia ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 94th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.