Kiribati vs San Marino: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Kiribati
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 755.62 million SLC against 404.05 million SLC in Kiribati, a difference of 351.57 million SLC.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.9 times Kiribati's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 111th and San Marino ranks 110th of 114 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 284.94 million SLC | 637.97 million SLC | 353.03 million SLC | San Marino |
| 2020s | 336.67 million SLC | 713.68 million SLC | 377.02 million SLC | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Kiribati or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 755.62 million SLC against 404.05 million SLC in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Kiribati and San Marino?
- 351.57 million SLC, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and San Marino rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Kiribati ranks 111th and San Marino ranks 110th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.