Honduras vs Ireland: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Honduras
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 125,547 million SLC against 119,486 million SLC in Honduras, a difference of 6,061 million SLC.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ireland ahead.
Honduras ranks 72nd and Ireland ranks 70th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53,049 million SLC | 64,002 million SLC | 10,953 million SLC | Ireland |
| 2010s | 101,177 million SLC | 80,552 million SLC | 20,625 million SLC | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Honduras or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 125,547 million SLC against 119,486 million SLC in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Honduras and Ireland?
- 6,061 million SLC, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Ireland?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Honduras and Ireland rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Honduras ranks 72nd and Ireland ranks 70th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.