Guatemala vs Singapore: Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency
Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Guatemala
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 183,996 million SLC against 139,743 million SLC in Guatemala, a difference of 44,253 million SLC.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 69th and Singapore ranks 66th of 114 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 84,196 million SLC | 73,949 million SLC | 10,247 million SLC | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 122,564 million SLC | 131,861 million SLC | 9,297 million SLC | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency, Guatemala or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 183,996 million SLC against 139,743 million SLC in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency between Guatemala and Singapore?
- 44,253 million SLC, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Singapore rank globally for total expenditure (general government) — value standard local currency?
- Guatemala ranks 69th and Singapore ranks 66th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Total Expenditure (general government) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.